De Klerk, N., Abma, T. A., Bamelis, L. L., & Arntz, A. (2016). Schema therapy for personality disorders: A qualitative study of patients’ and therapists’ perspectives. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465816000357
Summary by: Fathimath Faseeha
In recent
years, schema therapy has become increasingly popular among mental health
practitioners in treating individuals with a variety of psychological issues, especially
in treating personality disorders. However, despite the popularity and
effectiveness, there has been little research conducted in studying the
perspectives of patients and therapists with regards to schema therapy.
Therefore, the current qualitative research aims to explore the experiences and
perspectives of both patients and therapists involved in schema therapy for
treating personality disorders, focusing primarily on borderline personality
disorder and avoidant personality disorders.
To achieve this,
the research conducted in-depth interviews with 16 patients and 16 therapists
from an ongoing randomized controlled trial of group schema therapy for on
borderline personality disorder and avoidant personality disorders in Norway.
Participants shared their experiences and thoughts on the therapy process, the
therapeutic relationship, change mechanisms, and outcomes. The study uses
thematic analysis to examine semi-structured interview data from 16 patients
and 16 therapists. The researchers employed a collaborative analysis approach
involving the perspectives of both therapists who have experience in schema
therapy and researchers who were not directly involved in practicing schema
therapy to ensure interpretive depth and objectivity.
The results of this
study were divided into three aspects; first, aspects of schema therapy that
patients and therapists found helpful, second, aspects they found unhelpful and,
third, recommendations given by both groups for improving schema therapy. For
helpful aspects, therapeutic relationships were seen as positive, intense and
substantially different from other forms of psychotherapy by both therapists
and patients. The therapeutic frame of schema therapy was also mentioned by
both groups as helpful where patients recognized this frame as a tool that
helped them to understand their emotions and behaviors while therapists
believed that this frame helped them to structure their sessions. Specific
schema therapy techniques such as imagery were mentioned by both groups as a
helpful aspect. For unhelpful aspects, the study revealed that patients stated
that they felt a time pressure in schema therapy which was unhelpful, however,
therapists had varying opinions about this aspect. Additionally, lack of information, lack of
practical application and lack of shared focus between therapists and clients
were also seen by the participants as unhelpful aspects. For recommendations,
providing clear information in advance was mentioned by the patients as an
important aspect that needs to be incorporated into schema therapy. Therapists recommended
establishing proper connection between the present and past in the imagery,
giving more responsibility for patients in the final phase of therapy and
providing more experiential training as recommendations to improve schema
therapy.
While the study
has limitations such as less sample size and low generalizability, the study
provides important insights into the perspectives of patients and therapists
when it comes to schema therapy. The authors also state that this is the first
qualitative study that explores both patient’s and therapist’s experiences and
perspectives of schema therapy, therefore, this study serves as an important
foundation for future research to further expand the understanding of schema
therapy. Additionally, the recommendations identified by the therapists and
patients of this study can also add valuable insight to develop and increase
the effectiveness of schema therapy.