Görg, N., Böhnke, J. R., Priebe, K., Rausch, S., Wekenmann, S., Ludäscher, P., Bohus, M., & Kleindienst, N. (2019). Changes in Trauma‐Related Emotions following treatment with Dialectical Behavior therapy for posttraumatic stress Disorder after childhood abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(5), 764–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22440
Summary by: Alma Aldema
Introduction
I’ll start by highlighting why this study matters. PTSD isn't just
about fear, it also involves deep emotional responses like shame or guilt,
especially in cases of childhood trauma. Treatments like PE and EMDR are great
for reducing classic PTSD symptoms, but they may not fully resolve these more
complex emotional reactions. That’s where DBT-PTSD comes in, it's specifically
designed to address both the core symptoms and these emotionally driven aspects
of CPTSD.
Study Aims
The study had three aims: first, to measure whether emotions like
shame, guilt, and disgust changed after treatment. Second, check if these
changes were independent of improvements in PTSD symptoms. And third, to see
how many participants reached emotion levels like those in people without PTSD.
Method
The intervention was an intensive, structured 3-month DBT-PTSD
program delivered in a residential setting. It combined standard DBT
elements—like emotion regulation and mindfulness—with trauma-specific
techniques. One key feature was skills-assisted exposure, which helped prevent
dissociation during trauma processing. The treatment also directly targeted
negative self-beliefs and worked toward helping participants accept their
traumatic experiences as part of their past, not their identity.
Participants
It's important to note that this was a relatively small and
specific sample—mostly women with PTSD related to childhood abuse, and many had
additional diagnoses like depression or borderline personality disorder (BPD).
This makes the sample clinically relevant for complex PTSD, but it also limits
how widely we can generalize the findings to other trauma populations.
Measures
To evaluate change, the researchers used simple but effective
tools. Emotions were rated using 0–100 scales, asking participants how
intensely they felt specific emotions when thinking about their trauma. PTSD
symptoms were measured using the DTS, a well-established and reliable measure.
Finally, they compared the participants' outcomes to a nonclinical reference
group—people with similar trauma histories but without PTSD—to see if emotional
levels normalized after treatment.
Analysis
The analysis was designed to test not just whether emotions
changed, but whether those changes went beyond general PTSD improvement. By
using MANOVA, the researchers could isolate the emotional shifts that weren’t
simply side effects of PTSD symptom relief. They also used clinical
significance benchmarks to see if participants reached emotional levels
comparable to those without PTSD.
Results
The results showed significant improvements across most
trauma-related emotions. By the end of treatment, a substantial proportion of
participants reached nonclinical levels for these emotions, most notably, 76%
for guilt and 69% for shame. These are very meaningful changes, especially
considering the severity and persistence of these emotions in complex PTSD.
When we look at effect sizes, the largest improvements were seen in
guilt, shame, fear, helplessness, and disgust. Interestingly, anger and sadness
did not show significant change, which may suggest those emotions are either
more complex or require different interventions.
Finally, radical acceptance—which is a core goal in DBT-PTSD—also
increased significantly, with a large effect size. And it’s important to note
that even after controlling PTSD symptom reduction, improvements in emotions
like guilt and shame remained significant. That tells us this therapy doesn't
just help with symptoms—it helps people emotionally process the trauma on a
deeper level.
Discussion
This study highlights that DBT-PTSD has a distinct impact on
trauma-related emotions, particularly guilt and shame—likely because it
addresses them directly through exposure and cognitive work. Anger may be more
complex, possibly serving an adaptive role in reframing blame. Radical
acceptance improved, but for many, it remained a challenge. As for limitations,
there was no active treatment control group, the sample was relatively small,
and we don’t know if these gains were maintained long-term.
Nincsenek megjegyzések:
Megjegyzés küldése