Barnicot, K., & Crawford, M. (2019). Dialectical behaviour therapy v. mentalisation-based therapy for borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine, 49(12), 2060–2068. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718002878
Summary by: Hadija Satel
Introduction: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a mental health
condition that involves emotional instability, self-harm, problems in
relationships, and frequent use of emergency or hospital services. Two
therapies that are commonly used to treat BPD are Dialectical Behaviour Therapy
(DBT) and Mentalisation-Based Therapy (MBT). While both treatments have strong
evidence supporting their effectiveness, there has never been a direct
comparison between the two. The 2019 study by Barnicot and Crawford, published
in Psychological Medicine aimed to
examine how DBT and MBT compare in terms of clinical outcomes over a 12-month
period.DBT is a therapy that focuses on teaching practical skills to manage
emotions, reduce self-harm, and improve relationships. It combines
cognitive-behavioural methods with mindfulness. MBT, focuses on helping
patients understand their own and others' mental states more clearly. This
process is called mentalizing. While DBT is usually delivered over 12 months,
MBT often lasts around 18 months, but for the purpose of this study, both
treatments were evaluated over the same 12-month period.
Method: The study included 90 adults diagnosed with BPD. 58
participants received DBT and 32 participants received MBT in six specialist
NHS personality disorder services in London and Southampton. The allocation of
participants was not randomized. The choice of therapy was based on what was
available in each local service. This approach demonstrated real-life practice
but also meant there were some differences in the patient groups. At the
beginning of the study,the researchers saw that people in the DBT group tended
to have more severe symptoms. They were more likely to have self-harmed
recently, had more frequent hospital visits, and higher rates of post-traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD). They also showed higher levels of emotional
dysregulation. These differences were important and were taken into account in
the statistical analysis. Throughout the 12-month period, participants were
assessed every three months. The study measured how many people dropped out of
therapy, how often they used crisis services, how often they self-harmed, and
their levels of BPD symptoms, emotional dysregulation, dissociation, and
interpersonal difficulties.
Results: The results showed that both DBT and MBT helped reduce
symptoms of BPD. At the end of the 12 months, there were no significant
differences between the two groups in terms of self-harm rates, emotional
dysregulation, BPD severity, or relationship difficulties. This means that both
treatments appeared to be similarly effective by the end of the year. However,
when looking at how quickly patients improved over time, there were important
differences. People receiving DBT had a steeper reduction in self-harm
incidents and faster improvements in emotional dysregulation than those
receiving MBT. These findings remained significant even after adjusting for
differences in baseline severity, dropout rates, and other confounding factors.
This suggests that while both therapies work, DBT may help patients improve
more quickly in reducing self-harming behavior and improving emotional
control.The study also found differences in treatment dropout. A larger
percentage of MBT patients (72%) completed the full 12 months of therapy
compared to DBT patients (42%). However, once the researchers adjusted for
initial differences between the groups, this difference in completion rates was
no longer statistically significant. The higher dropout rate in DBT may be
partly explained by the fact that patients starting DBT had more severe
symptoms and may have had more difficulty staying engaged. Interestingly, while
DBT patients initially seemed to use crisis services more often, these
differences disappeared once the analysis controlled for the more severe
starting point of the DBT group. In other words, DBT patients may not have used
crisis services more because of the therapy itself, but because they were
already more at risk before starting treatment.
Discussion: The study has several strengths. It was conducted in
real-world clinical settings with actual NHS services, making the results
relevant to everyday practice. It also included people who dropped out of
treatment, which gives a more complete picture of how the therapies perform in
practice. The researchers adjusted for initial differences between the two
groups. However, there were some limitations. Since patients were not randomly
assigned to DBT or MBT, it’s possible that unknown factors influenced the
results. Also, the study only followed patients for 12 months, while BPD is a
long-term condition that may require longer follow-up to fully understand
treatment effects. Another limitation was that the researchers did not assess
how closely the therapists followed the official DBT or MBT manuals, which
could affect how effective the treatments were.
In conclusion, this study found that
both DBT and MBT are helpful for people with BPD. however there were
differences such as DBT appeared to produce faster improvements in reducing
self-harm and emotional dysregulation. MBT, on the other hand, may have better
retention rates. These results show that
both treatments have their strengths, and choosing between them might depend on
the individual needs of the patient, such as their level of risk or ability to
stay engaged in long-term therapy. This study also shows the importance of
offering a variety of evidence-based treatments within mental health services,
so that patients with BPD can receive care that best fits their circumstances.
While more research, especially randomised trials is still needed, this
comparison gives useful guidance for clinicians and services when deciding
which therapy to offer.
Nincsenek megjegyzések:
Megjegyzés küldése